Question #11: Is it a sin to sing uninspired hymns in worship?
Blog Stats
- 199,395 hits
Meta
Blogroll
- Genevan Psalter
- King and Kirk
- Proof that God Exists
- Psalm Singing Online
- PsalmSingers.com
- Psalterium
- Puritanboard EP Forum
- Reformation Ireland
- Reformation Scotland
- Reformed Books Online
- Selah Psalm Blog
- Sing the Psalms
- The 1650 Psalter
- The Bayhead Blog – North Uist and Grimsay FCC
- The Genevan Psalter
- URC Psalmody
Confessions
Covenanters
EP Church Plants
EP Churches
- Dallas RP Church (RPCNA) Dallas, TX
- Exclusive Psalmody Churches
- Immanuel Chapel (RPCNA) – Dayton, TN
- North Uist and Grimsay FCC
- Presbytery of the US, Free Church of Scotland (Continuing)
- Puritan Evangelical Church of America, San Diego, CA
- Reformed Presbyterian Church of Scotland (RPCS)
- Reformed Presbyterican Church of North America (RPCNA)
- Sternoway Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCS)
- Stillwater Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA)
- Topeka Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA)
- Trinity Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA) of Wichita, KS
History
Links
Seminaries
-
Recent Posts
- Introductory Worship Service in Houston (RPCNA)
- The Keys Psalter
- Grave Sweet Melody
- Greetings from the Belle Center, Ohio, Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA)
- THE PSALMES OF DAVID IN English Meeter, set forth by FRANCIS Rous, 1643
- “One of the major issues between Rankin and the Transylvania Presbytery was his conviction that the Psalms of David alone were to be sung in public worship, to the exclusion of Isaac Watts’ imitations.”
- [On Col. 3:16 and Eph. 5:19] “in these verses the direction given is not to prepare or provide songs of praise, but only to sing them.”
- Is it a pleasure to thee to sing Psalms?
- Solomon Stoddard on the singing of Psalms…
- Titles on Exclusive Psalmody from Puritan Publications:
- Pamphlets Online
- New meeting location for Dallas Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA)
- Reformed Presbyterian Church in San Antonio (RPCNA) is now meeting for worship
- New EP congregation: Portland-Vancouver Fellowship
- ….we mourn over their indifference to and disregard of many important and precious truths of God’s word, and the substituting of human inventions for divine institutions in the worship of God. Especially is the praise of God corrupted by human hymns, which in the matter of many of them, as well as in the want of divine appointment for all, are unfit for the worship of God…
- 1650 Psalter 1650 Scottish Psalter ARP authors Biographies book reviews books church planting Col 3:16 corporate worship Covenanter martyrs Covenanters Dallas debate debates denominations division ecclesiology encouragement Eph 5:19 Exclusive Psalmody family worship FPCS Free Church of Scotland Free Church of Scotland (continuing) Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland Geneva Glasgow historical articles history hymns instrumental music instruments John Calvin John Knox ministers Naphtali Press news New Song Old Testament Pageland RPC Plenary Assembly poetry Project Psalms Psalmody CDs Psalms Psalm singing Psalter questions Recordings Reformation Reformed Covenanter Reformed Presbyterian Reformed Presbyterian and Covenanter Magazine Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary (RPTS) Regulative Principle of Worship Rev. Kenneth Stewart Roman Catholic Rome RPCNA RPCS RPW scotland Scottish Church sin Texas The Book of Psalms for Worship The church Thomas Houston Westminster Assembly Westminster Confession of Faith Westminster Divines William Symington worship Worthy to be Praised
Categories
- 1650 Scottish Psalter
- Adam Rankin
- Alexander Blaikie
- Alexander Gordon
- Andrew Barnes
- Audio
- Bangalore
- Belle Center
- Biographies
- Book Reviews
- CD Reviews
- Christian Herring
- Church Plants
- Contemporary Worship
- Covenanter Witness
- Covenanters
- Cuthbert Sidenham
- Dallas Reformed Presbyterian Fellowship (RPCNA)
- David Karoon
- David Murray
- David Rees
- Debates
- Dennis Prutow
- Donald Macdonald
- Donnie Mackinnon
- Edgar Ibarra
- EPCA
- Family Worship
- Francis Rous
- Free Church of Scotland (Continuing)
- George Gillespie
- Grange Press
- H. C. R. Bazely
- Henry Cooke
- Historical Articles
- History Lectures
- Ian Wise
- J G Vos
- J. J. Lim
- James Latta
- Jerry O'Neill
- John Anderson
- John Brown
- John Calvin
- John Edgar
- John Flavel
- John Kennedy
- John Knox
- John L. Girardeau
- John Lightfoot
- John McNaugher
- John Nisbet of Hardhill
- John Nisbet the younger
- John Sawtelle
- John Taylor Pressly
- John W. Bain
- Jonathan Leach
- Josias Chancellor
- Kenneth Stewart
- maps
- Mark Fitzpatrick
- Matthew Henry
- Matthew McMahon
- Matthew Winzer
- Michael Bushell
- Midwest Presbytery of the RPCNA
- News
- Online Psalters
- Our Confession
- Pacific Coast Presbytery
- PCA
- Project Psalms
- Psalter Reviews
- Questions
- Quotes
- R. Andrew Myers
- R. J. George
- R. Scott Clark
- Reformed Collective
- Reformed Presbyterian International Conference
- Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary (RPTS)
- Reviews
- Robert Baillie
- Robert James Dodds
- Rowan Murphy
- RPCGA
- RPCNA
- RPCS
- S E Martin
- S. P. Stewart
- Samuel Wesley
- San Antonio, TX
- Scott Maciver
- Selah Psalm Blog
- sermons
- Solomon Stoddard
- The Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (ARP)
- The Original Covenanter
- The Reformed Presbyterian and Covenanter
- Thomas Ford
- Thomas Houston
- Thomas Joel Bonner
- Thomas Watson
- Timothy Duguid
- Tom Mann
- Travis Fentiman
- Travis Fentimen
- Uncategorized
- United Presbyterian Church
- URCNA
- Venkatesh Gopalakrishnan
- Videos
- W J McKnight
- Walter Scott
- Wayne Spear
- Westminster Assembly
- Which Psalter?
- William H. Vincent
- William Macleod
- William Marshall
- William Melancthon Glasgow
- William Ramsey Hemphill
- William Romaine
- William S. McClure
- William Symington
- William W. Keys
- 1650 Scottish Psalter Adam Rankin Audio Biographies Book Reviews CD Reviews Church Plants David Karoon Debates Dennis Prutow Family Worship Historical Articles J G Vos John Calvin John Knox Kenneth Stewart maps News Project Psalms Questions Quotes R. Scott Clark Reviews RPCNA RPCS Thomas Houston Uncategorized Which Psalter? William Ramsey Hemphill William Romaine
Archives
- October 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (2)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (2)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (2)
- June 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (1)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (5)
- August 2013 (4)
- July 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (4)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (8)
- December 2012 (5)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (3)
- September 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (5)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (2)
- October 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (6)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (6)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (10)
- October 2010 (7)
- September 2010 (8)
- August 2010 (4)
Pages
Some who believe in exclusive Psalmody believe it is a sin to sing non-inspired hymns in worship, while others in the EP camp do not. This is a really controversial question within the controversial topic of EP. I realize not all EPers agree on the answer to this question.
Of course, those who don’t hold to EP believe they have permission to do things in worship that are not forbidden. From this perspective, it would not be a sin to sing a non-inspired hymn in worship. But notice from this perspective that it would also not be forbidden to include _______ in worship, you fill in the blank. As long as Scripture does not forbid it, we are allowed to do it.
This has never been the position of historic Reformed teaching. Instead, we believe that only that which is commanded is allowed in worship. This is radically different from the above proposition and it is known historically as the Regulative Principle of Worship. Scripture regulates worship by telling us what is to be included, not by allowing us to do whatever it does not forbid.
In seeking to answer the question “Is it a sin to sing uninspired songs in worship?”, we notice the second commandment:
Q. 107 of the Westminster Larger Catechism: Which is the second commandment? Answer: The second commandment is, Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
The Westminster Divines clearly stated their position on religious worship.
CHAPTER XXI. Of Religious Worship and the Sabbath-day.
I. The light of nature showeth that there is a God, who hath lordship and sovereignty over all; is good, and doeth good unto all; and is therefore to be feared, loved, praised, called upon, trusted in, and served with all the hearth, and with all the soul, and with all the might. But the acceptable way of worshipping the true God is instituted by himself, and so limited by his own revealed will, that he may not be worshipped according to the imaginations and devices of men, or the suggestions of Satan, under any visible representation or any other way not prescribed in the holy Scripture.
If singing man-made hymns is worship “according to the imaginations and devices of men”, we can come to no other conclusion than to say that singing uninspired hymns is sinful. If it is not commanded by God, it is an act in disobedience to God’s revealed will.
Again, I understand there will other opinions even within the EP groups, but I think this question is worthy of our discussion. Please chime in if you are so inclined.
UPDATE: I forgot to add the observation that we have an Apostolic command to sing “psalms, hymns and spiritual songs” in the New Testament in Eph. 5:19 and Col. 3:16. If we understand these passages to be referring to the inspired Psalms of the Old Testament (not convincing to many, I know), we are violating this command by not singing the Psalms or by singing uninspired songs in their place. The point being there are several ways we could easily make the case that singing uninspired songs is in fact sinful.
I think this is a worthy question for us to consider. Last year I was speaking to someone who understood the EP position (sort of) though he was not convinced. He was disgusted by the fact that some who were EP actually believed it was sinful to sing a man-made hymn in worship. I was surprised to hear that he was surprised. Of course that is what we are saying when we say that we only have authority to sing the Psalms in worship. To do anything else would be disobedient to God, and would be a sin.
If you think singing uninspired songs is not a sin, I would be interested in hearing your justification for coming to that conclusion.
I think a more serious question for consideration is this: How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Or, if someone is on this blog on the Lord’s Day, are they breaking the Sabbath according to John Calvin? Or if they use lights and water, requiring the employment of someone else on the Lord’s Day, are they guilty of breaking the Sabbath by proxy? These are the burning questions of the hour. Meanwhile, 99% of all churches are eyeball deep in real apostasy as emergent heresy and mysticism sweeps the country. Good to see that the Reformed camp is busy discussing the deeply meaningful issues of the hour. Good grief.
How do you think much of the church (visible) arrived at apostasy? In part y doing things alien to God’s word and calling it worship of Him, not unlike Aaron saying the worship of the Golden calf at the foot of Mt SanaI was worship of YHWH, instead of being worship of other, imagined gods (which the people openly declared it to beat first). Give a little here, be inventive there. Of course, the underlying man-centered, man-as-sovereign belief that characterizes Arminianism and Pelagianism give rise to sinful worship of man to attract men supposedly to be told how they can exercise their free will and get themselves saved (and from what, I may ask? A dull life. lackluster romance?)
Well, from your username and post, it seems to me that you are one of the many people who are tired of and frustrated by being “blown by every wind of doctrine” arising from the Church’s–even the Reformed Church’s–even the EP Church’s for that matter–disunity and disorder. I too have grown weary and sick of this state, and I feel especially for you about your concerns of mysticism entering the Church. My sympathies are very much with you. Apologies though if I have presumed too much.
It is important to realize that the worship of God is given the highest priority in the Reformed camp. As such, things which may seem “trifling” (like whether it is a sin to sing uninspired hymns) are not so. Even the “circumstances” (to use WCF terminology)–though adiaphora–are to be regulated by the general principles of Scripture. Along with this, the Reformed believe that the purifying of worship–which to them is a part of right doctrine–plays a large part in saving congregations–and thus eventually the Church–from serious error and heresy. Thus, it really isn’t fair to compare this question to asking how many angels can dance on a pin’s head (though I do realize that you were merely making a point).
However, you are correct that the Church is in a state of crisis which should be addressed. People in the Reformed camp do indeed address those issues. They view those issues as deeply meaningful too. Though they view the worship of God to be of utmost priority, they do not discuss it at the expense of discussing those issues you have rightly mentioned and other like issues. I should mention though, that I am in no position to determine the position of the entire “Reformed camp” on this issue and can only speak from what I know of them. Indeed, technically I am a modern Evangelical because I am a member of a modern Evangelical Church. What I know is mostly limited to the relatively (relative to how much is out there) few Reformed works, articles, and blogs I have read or partially read and my experiences of browsing the Puritanboard. It could just be that I have had a selective experience of the Reformed camp; I do not deny that I am selective in what I read in that I try to read the best of the best in accordance with the wise maxim of a mathematician, “Learn from the masters, not the pupils.” From my experience and small knowledge of Church history, the Reformed are just about the nicest and most balanced Christians I have ever seen. The RPCNA’s website heading is telling: “Evangelism is not a spectator sport.” Yes, they do discuss issues which seem trifling–perhaps even seeming trifling to some within their camp, but they do not do so at the expense of discussing issues which everyone agrees to be important.
If you have been seeing a lot of discussion on exclusive psalmody lately, it is important to remember a couple things. Namely, first that this is a site dedicated to this issue and so it will bring things up such as this topic which may seem trifling. Mr. Koller has another blog which deals with more general things. Next, that the surprising decision of the Free Church has brought to remembrance the issue of exclusive psalmody and so naturally everyone will be talking about it for a while–after which the hype will probably die down again, and people will go back to dealing with such issues as you have mentioned.
However, your experience with the Reformed camp may have been different, and it indeed may encompass more than what I have been exposed to. I do not deny that in my studies I have encountered such issues of the Sabbath that you have mentioned–though in most cases they were refutations of those positions you mentioned. I’m sorry you feel that way about the Reformed camp because it is a terrible feeling. Thanks for posting and contributing to the discussion with the very reasonable concerns contained in your answer!
It is a huge presumption to say that Eph. 5:19 and Col. 3:16 apply to the OT Psalms only and to force that weak interpreation on the church at large causes division where there doesn’t need one. There should be room within individual congregations to be EP within the larger denomonation if that is their conviction.
but problems always occur when you are stricter than God’s Word.